Something doesn’t add up.
Here’s where to start.
Every service, every price point. From a 60-minute call to a retained enterprise advisory. Scan the categories below — the right entry point is the one that matches where you are right now.
Need an answer fast? Start here.
Low commitment, defined scope, fast delivery. These are the right entry points when you need clarity before you decide what to do next.
Case Strategy Intensive
We get on a call. I give you an honest read of your situation, a direct action roadmap, and the institutional intelligence you need to move forward — without the runaround. No fluff, no upsell. Just a clear answer.
- Honest situational read
- Direct action roadmap
- What to do next — and what not to do
- Written summary note delivered after call
24-Hour Document Forensics
You send me the documents. I map the contradictions, identify the risk points, and deliver findings within 24 hours. If there’s something worth knowing, I will find it. Written findings with source citations — not a conversation.
- Contradiction mapping across documents
- Risk point identification with citations
- Written findings memo
- Go / No-Go signal included
Record Review
I read your documents and tell you what they say versus what they should say. A structured written summary of what the record actually shows — every contradiction flagged, every gap documented. The foundation for any further action.
- Full document review
- Timeline built from the record, not from memory
- Every contradiction identified and cited
- Written findings summary
FOIA Strategy Session
You know there is a record. You need to know how to ask for it, which exemptions to anticipate, and what to do when they refuse. A focused 30-minute call on one FOIA situation — before you file or after a denial. Not the drafting service. The strategy that makes the request work.
- Jurisdiction-specific request strategy
- Exemption anticipation and challenge approach
- Escalation pathway if they withhold
- Pairs with FOIA Request Drafting Service
When the record doesn’t hold, I find where it breaks.
These are full analytical engagements — not summaries, not conversations. Each produces a written report built to the same standard as published Clutch Justice investigations.
Case Analysis & Procedural Risk Report
The full read. I go through your documents, build the actual timeline from what’s written down — not what anyone says happened — and identify every place the record contradicts itself, skips a required step, or doesn’t support the conclusion being drawn from it.
- Full review of your documents
- Timeline reconstructed from primary sources
- Every contradiction identified and sourced
- Procedural failures mapped to specific requirements
- Written findings — court records, admin filings, agency documents
Case Integrity Brief
For matters that span multiple records, agencies, or time periods. Timeline reconstruction plus cross-document contradiction mapping, delivered as a structured written memo. Built for attorneys, advocates, and families preparing to escalate — this is the document you hand to counsel.
- Multi-source timeline reconstruction
- Cross-document contradiction mapping
- Exposure assessment with risk flags
- Attorney-ready memo format
- Source citations throughout
Know your judge before you walk in.
Sentencing patterns aren’t random — they’re documented. These reports turn public records into litigation strategy. No intuition. No guesswork. Sourced pattern recognition.
Judicial Snapshot
Fast reference profile for judges who appear frequently in Michigan’s high-volume courts. Pre-built, sourced, updated quarterly.
- Sentencing overview by case type
- JTC complaint flag + count
- Court and appointment history
Full Judicial Profile
Same sourced methodology as custom reports — pre-built for high-volume Michigan judges. Full disciplinary timeline, procedural patterns, strategic flags. Updated quarterly.
- Full disciplinary timeline
- Procedural pattern summary
- Key rulings flagged for strategic relevance
- Sentencing trend data by case type
Judicial History Analysis — Standard
A custom judicial history report built from public records — documented sentencing trends, disciplinary history, procedural patterns, and strategic flags relevant to your matter. No guesswork. No intuition. The record is the source.
- Sentencing trends across comparable case types
- Full JTC complaint history and disciplinary record
- Procedural pattern summary
- Key rulings flagged for strategic relevance
- Delivered as formatted PDF
Judicial History Analysis — Rush
Everything in the Standard report, delivered in 48 hours. Prioritized queue, direct email delivery with analyst summary note. Built for urgent hearing prep when you don’t have five days.
- Full standard report content, expedited
- Priority queue placement
- Analyst summary note included
- Direct email delivery
Before the policy becomes the problem.
For organizations, advocates, and government entities who need to know where a policy, bill, or initiative breaks down — before it’s enacted, challenged, or becomes a liability.
Policy Integrity Brief
A deep-dive Friction Audit on one proposed policy, bill, or organizational initiative. I identify where the language creates unintended exposure, where the implementation will break down, and where adversarial scrutiny will find the gaps — before anyone else does.
- Full friction audit of the policy as written
- Identification of implementation failure points
- Adversarial exposure mapping
- Contradiction with existing law or policy
- Written findings memo with recommendations
Government Institutional Integrity Assessment
A structured review of your government entity’s compliance posture — FOIA response timelines, ADA documentation, misconduct reporting, and policy-vs-practice gaps — mapped against the standard they’d be held to in a real audit or DOJ inquiry.
- FOIA compliance audit
- ADA accommodation documentation review
- Misconduct reporting escalation mapping
- Policy-vs-practice gap analysis
- Written findings memo with remediation priorities
For organizations where being wrong about institutional risk is not an option.
These engagements are for law firms, SIU teams, litigation finance, healthcare payers, legal AI companies, and political operations. Defined scope. Written deliverables. Built to survive adversarial scrutiny.
Institutional Exposure Diagnostic
A structured forensic scan of the records in front of you. Contradiction mapping, procedural gap analysis, risk exposure summary — delivered as a written memo before you commit to a position. For litigation finance teams, this functions as a Pre-Commitment Brief: case record quality, lead attorney track record, jurisdictional pattern, and credibility of the factual basis — risk-rated and written before capital is committed.
- Contradiction scan across available records
- Procedural gap map with source citations
- Risk exposure summary with Go/No-Go signal
- Attorney-ready written findings memo
- Litigation finance variant: case quality + attorney + jurisdiction risk-rated
Adversarial Stress Test
Full record review and timeline reconstruction. The question is not whether the record looks clean — it’s whether it holds when someone is actively trying to break it. Built for counsel, SIU directors, and legal AI teams who need to know before the other side finds out.
- Full record review and timeline reconstruction
- Inconsistency report with source citations
- AI output audit against primary docket records
- Pattern and relationship mapping
- Go/No-Go recommendation with written rationale
AI Output Audit — Legal Tech
Your AI summarizes court records. I verify them. Those are different jobs. A structured audit comparing AI-generated legal outputs against primary docket records — written findings, sourced, built to withstand adversarial scrutiny before liability becomes a headline.
- AI output vs. primary record comparison
- Inconsistency and hallucination mapping
- Risk exposure summary with source citations
- Written findings memo — attorney and product team ready
- Scoped by document volume and output complexity
Expert Report, Declaration & Framing
Original research reports, policy briefs, legislative framing documents, and signed expert declarations written to publication and litigation standard. Built to survive scrutiny in legal, regulatory, and public contexts. For attorneys who need a signed, citable declaration documenting institutional process patterns and procedural findings for use in a filing.
- Signed expert declarations — institutional process and procedural pattern matters
- Research reports and policy briefs
- Legislative framing documents
- Expert declarations and affidavits
- Publication-standard sourcing throughout
Payer & SIU Fraud Pattern Brief
Provider fraud patterns leave procedural fingerprints in public records. I read those records. A structured report mapping provider or claimant behavioral patterns against court filings, licensing records, disciplinary history, and public judgment records.
- Provider pattern analysis against public record sources
- Licensing, disciplinary, and litigation history
- Behavioral pattern mapping with source citations
- Written findings memo — SIU and counsel ready
- Scoped per provider or claimant pattern
Institutional exposure doesn’t stop. Neither does the monitoring.
For attorneys, organizations, and enterprise teams with active matters and continuous exposure. Recurring deliverables, defined cadence, priority access.
Litigation Risk Subscription
Ongoing docket monitoring, judicial discipline flag alerts, and monthly pattern briefs across your active case roster. You have active matters. You’re getting judicial intelligence on none of them. This changes that.
- Monthly written brief on flagged docket events
- Judicial discipline and JTC alert emails
- Pattern intelligence across your active matter roster
- Scoped by case volume — pricing set at intake
- Priority turnaround on urgent flag events
Judicial Red Flag Watchlist
When your judge gets a JTC complaint, a disciplinary flag, or a Michigan Supreme Court order, you get an email that day. You check the docket. You check your email. Now check your judge.
- Real-time JTC activity and disciplinary monitoring
- Michigan Supreme Court order alerts
- Alert email on every flag event — same business day
- $29/month for one judge · $49/month for up to five
- Cancel anytime · No annual commitment required
Before the funder, the board, or the journalist finds the gap.
For nonprofits, advocacy organizations, campaigns, and public interest entities who need to know what the public record says about them — and what it says about the people they’re about to hire, fund, or testify against.
Nonprofit Compliance Exposure Scan
A structured scan of your organization’s public record exposure before a funder, board member, or journalist does it for you. IRS filings, litigation history, key personnel disciplinary records, and policy-vs-practice gaps — mapped and flagged.
- IRS filing and public record footprint review
- Litigation and regulatory history
- Key personnel disciplinary record check
- Policy-vs-practice gap identification
- Written findings with priority risk flags
Legislative Testimony & Record Support
You’re going on record. I make sure the record is ready for you. A sourced evidentiary brief built for legislative testimony, regulatory comment, or public advocacy — primary record analysis, procedural history, and contradiction identification before you step in front of a committee.
- Primary record analysis anchored in source documents
- Procedural history reconstruction
- Contradiction identification and adversarial gap mapping
- Sourced evidentiary brief in submission-ready format
- Rush turnaround available for time-sensitive hearings
Executive & Board Candidate Vetting Brief
Before you vote to hire them, know what the public record says. A journalism-grade public record vetting brief on executive or board candidates — litigation history, regulatory discipline, corporate record, and public statement consistency.
- Litigation history and court record review
- Regulatory and professional disciplinary history
- Corporate filing and public statement review
- Written findings brief — board-ready format
- $2,500 per candidate · $4,000 for slate of three or more
Not every situation needs a full engagement. Some just need the right document.
Defined-scope, fast-turnaround products for individuals, families, advocates, and attorneys who need a specific deliverable — not a full forensic engagement.
FOIA Request Drafting Service
You know there’s a record. You just don’t know how to ask for it the right way. I draft the request — jurisdiction-matched, with exemption anticipation language and a follow-up escalation template included. They have to respond to this one.
- Professionally drafted FOIA or FOIA-equivalent request
- Jurisdiction-matched language and statutory citations
- Exemption anticipation and specificity language
- Follow-up escalation template included
- $150 standard · $350 complex multi-agency requests
Institutional Accountability Report Card
A public-record accountability assessment of a government entity, court, or institution — scored across six categories with source citations and delivered as a shareable formatted PDF. Built for advocates who need to publish accountability data but lack the analytical infrastructure to do it credibly.
- Six-category scored accountability assessment
- Public record sourcing throughout
- Shareable formatted PDF deliverable
- $500 standard scope · $999 multi-agency assessments
- Grant-fundable for watchdog project buyers
Judicial Red Flag Watchlist — $29–$49/month
Monitor one judge or up to five. Get an alert email the same day a JTC complaint, disciplinary flag, or Michigan Supreme Court order drops. Cancel anytime.
Help with the paperwork — no analysis required.
Not every situation needs a forensic report. Sometimes you just need help filing something, understanding what a document says, or getting something notarized. These services exist for that.
Hourly document help — filing, organizing, understanding.
Help navigating forms, organizing records for submission, understanding what a document is asking for, or preparing a file for legal review. This is not legal advice and not forensic analysis — it is practical, guided document assistance.
Mobile Notary Services are available in the Greater Kalamazoo area. Remote Online Services also available.
Billed hourly · Minimum 1 hour · Invoiced before work begins
The record either supports the grievance or it doesn’t. I find out which.
For individuals preparing an AGC complaint, attorneys doing a pre-grievance conduct audit, and legal malpractice counsel who need a structured findings memo before undertaking representation.
Attorney Conduct Review & Grievance Documentation
Full review of attorney correspondence, filings, and billing records. Timeline reconstructed from primary sources. Conduct mapped against MRPC obligations. Written findings delivered as a structured memo you can hand directly to the AGC, to malpractice counsel, or to your attorney. The record either supports the grievance or it doesn’t. I find out which — before you file.
- Full document review — correspondence, filings, billing records
- Timeline reconstruction from primary sources only
- MRPC rule references mapped to documented conduct
- Contradiction identification with source citations
- Written findings memo — AGC-ready format
- Go/No-Go assessment with documented rationale
Pre-Grievance Conduct Audit
The same forensic record review, positioned for attorneys and law firms who want to know what their engagement record shows before the AGC does. I review the correspondence, the filings, the billing documentation, and the timeline for internal consistency — and deliver a structured findings memo identifying where the record holds and where it doesn’t. No surprises on the other side of the desk.
- Full engagement record review for internal consistency
- Timeline reconstruction and contradiction mapping
- MRPC compliance gap identification with citations
- Findings memo for attorney review and remediation planning
- Confidential — attorney-client privilege applies if engaged through counsel
Know who you’re working with. Know what the record says about you.
Forensic vetting of practitioners before co-counsel engagements, and technical remediation for manufactured narrative attacks in search results.
Attorney Due Diligence Report
Don’t tether your firm’s reputation to co-counsel you haven’t audited. A deep-dive forensic review of a practitioner’s documented record — case history, disciplinary filings, bar actions, court conduct patterns, and public record anomalies — before you bring them into an engagement.
- Full practitioner public record review
- Disciplinary history and bar action timeline
- Court conduct and case pattern analysis
- Public record anomaly identification
- Written findings memo — counsel-ready
Reputational SEO/AIO Recovery
If a coordinated campaign is weaponizing a manufactured narrative against you in search results, I use technical forensics to identify the infrastructure behind it and produce a documented remediation plan. The record is already public. I find where it was manipulated and how to correct it.
- Technical forensics on manufactured narrative infrastructure
- Domain registration and metadata analysis
- Public record correction documentation
- AI Overview and search result remediation strategy
- Written findings and action plan delivered
What the institution claims to do. What the record shows it actually does.
For foundations, oversight bodies, legislative staff, and journalists who need a documented evidentiary comparison between an institution’s stated policies and its operational record over time.
Institutional Drift Audit
A structured comparison of what an institution published — annual reports, policy documents, press releases, public commitments — against what the record actually shows over a defined time period. Court filings, FOIA responses, administrative orders, and complaint data mapped against stated institutional behavior. The Ascendium investigation is this methodology applied to a single subject. This is that methodology applied to your subject.
- Published claims inventory from institutional sources
- Operational record review from FOIA, court, and administrative filings
- Gap analysis: where stated behavior and documented behavior diverge
- Pattern identification across the time period reviewed
- Written findings memo with source citations throughout
- Structured for grant evaluation, legislative testimony, or publication
Institutional Accountability Report Card
A public-record accountability assessment of a government entity, court, or institution — scored across six categories with source citations and delivered as a shareable formatted PDF. They publish their annual report. Now you can publish yours.
- Six-category scored accountability assessment
- Public record sourcing throughout
- Shareable formatted PDF deliverable
- $500 standard scope · $999 multi-agency assessments
- Grant-fundable for watchdog project buyers
Ongoing exposure doesn’t need a one-time report. It needs a standing lens.
For organizations with a continuous pipeline of institutional risk decisions. Monthly retainer, defined deliverables, priority access.
Retained Institutional Risk Advisory
Monthly retainer for SIU teams, litigation finance, and enterprise legal ops with a continuous pipeline of case funding decisions, compliance exposure, or regulatory risk. Embedded forensic access — not a subscription to a one-time report.
- Ongoing exposure monitoring for active matters
- Pre-filing record review on demand
- Regulatory posture and audit readiness assessment
- Monthly written briefing with flagged risk items
- Priority access for time-sensitive requests
Speaking & Training
Keynotes, panel appearances, and staff training on institutional accountability, procedural abuse patterns, AI and the courts, and public records strategy. Built for legal, policy, academic, and advocacy audiences.
- Institutional accountability & procedural risk
- AI and the courts — failure modes & strategy
- Public records strategy & FOIA
- Sentencing data and judicial pattern analysis